Dr’s Says Half Of Medical Literature Completely Wrong
Dr’s Says Half Of Medical Literature Completely Wrong
We are talking the literature used to create vaccines and big pharma drugs and “treatments.” Well, at least according to Dr. Richard Horton, who is the Editor-In-Chief of the Medical Journal.
(via Lancet) “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
What this means is that the development of new drugs and vaccines would be created using data that lacks any credibility. What really stands out to me here is the “flagrant conflict of interest” which has been so obvious over the years. Big Pharmaceutical companies infuse money into a greater variety of these studies and strip them of any sincerity whatsoever.
Here is an excerpt from Dr. Marcia Angell, Editor-In_chief at New England Medical Journal.
(via Lancet) “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine”
- 9 Ergonomic Tips for Synchronizing Your Work Station and Office Chair - March 15, 2016
- Oregon Prioritizes Chiropractic, Complementary Therapies Over Painkillers and Surgery - September 1, 2015
- Dr’s Says Half Of Medical Literature Completely Wrong - July 22, 2015
Leave a Reply